Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

Whacked into Action

August 29th 2009 13:16
Hello, fellow travellers. Your humble, lazy commentator on the serious issues of the day - the way players choose to wear their shorts, for example - is back to whinge profusely on what will surely be the most over-analysed topic for the next week: Matthew Lloyd's bombs-away hit on Brad Sewell.

Readers with long memories will recall that I'm no fan of Lloyd on the basis of his pompous haircut (and, on reflection, the way he wears his shorts "due north").

That said, when his gelled-and-moused melon went flying into frame just as Sewell touched the ball, making direct shoulder-to-head contact, I was surprised. After a week of the bump rule being pored over endlessly, I was amazed at the idiocy of an experienced player taking such a stupid risk.


And let's avoid the "technicality" speak - Lloyd's hit on Sewell was much worse than Franklin's on Cousins. Franklin hit Cousins shoulder-to-shoulder, with the resulting head injury caused by a whiplash effect. At a maximum it was worth a one-week benching (which it should have been, barring the error from the initial review panel).

Lloyd had more time to react and the inevitable consequences of contact were easily foreseeable.

Most of the news reports have called this the turning point in the game, with Essendon "fired up" after the incident and compulsory brawl. More realistically, Hawthorn had nothing left on the interchange, too many senior players gone and too many inexperienced players on the field.

If anything, Essendon should leave this game questioning Lloyd's place in the side. Campbell Brown is right when he calls Lloyd a 'sniper'. He's also selfish and inconsistent. Essendon won today without Lloyd contributing much, besides offloading a key Hawthorn midfielder.


It's disappointing for Essendon players and supporters that their first finals series in five years will be overshadowed by this issue. Personally, I'd prefer to be giggling at the possibility of Collingwood losing to either Essendon or Carlton down the road.

There, I've had my rant. Next topic: Schadenfraude - The Port Adelaide Story.
44
Vote
   


Bloody Umpires

September 9th 2008 02:56
Crap umpiring is ruining the AFL. It needs to be said, preferably by someone with more clout than your humble complainer – say, the CEO – but we know that won’t happen. Umpires have become an unduly protected species, with even media commentators mostly barred from offering criticism, lest they upset anyone.

The fault for the deplorable state of umpiring in this fair game of ours lies squarely with the AFL. How can a professional sports league include rules as impossible to accurately interpret as “deliberately” putting the ball over the boundary? That rule is probably the one I find most frustrating, especially since I don’t think it needs to exist. So what if they put it over deliberately? If it’s on the full, it’s a free – if it’s tapped over, it’s a throw-in. Simple enough, isn’t it?

Overcomplicating the game is bad enough, but the overzealousness of the fabled Match Review Panel ® is truly breathtaking. How many good players have copped suspensions or lost Brownlow eligibility this year, for things that wouldn’t earn you a detention if you did it during PE?

[The Grumpy Traveller has been given 79 demerit points for this article.]
142
Vote
   


Why Footy Confidential is Unwatchable

September 1st 2008 12:26
Did anyone watch Footy Classified last night? I didn’t, since it clashed with other important activities in my schedule, like ordering books off Amazon for a quarter of what I’d pay at Borders (after shipping and handling AND taking into account the conversion rate, which I should have taken advantage of more often when it was at 98 cents. Alas, alas…). I wasn’t interested for more reasons than that – for one, being a bit sick of footy shows after the Sunday morning programs, where Tony Jones earned my everlasting affection for telling Billy Brownless that his book is crap.

Mostly, I wasn’t interested because there’s only so many times you can listen to Glenn Archer and Craig Hutchison pounce on every word Caroline Wilson says. She’s wrong sometimes, sure, but why make it such an obvious vendetta? ‘Hutchy’ doesn’t have a spotless track record with accuracy either, yet he doesn’t get shouted down and harassed for daring to have an opinion. And, in general, Archer’s problems with all journalists come across as childish and hypocritical.

In fairness to Wilson, she doesn’t really need another person rushing in to defend her. She can handle herself, as evidenced by her not having smacked anyone in the mouth (so far, and that we know of). No, I’m complaining about this because it’s become tedious television at best. How is it that everything gets turned into a reason to grill one member of the panel? The gist of every show is, more or less, comprised of the following:

“How can you say that, Caro? But do you have any evidence?” (In this scenario, Wilson might have suggested that Mark Thompson was thirsty or looked tired.)

“I don’t have any evidence, but I KNOW you would breach ethics!”

“While we’re at it, Caroline Wilson, why do you hate Christmas?”

Thanks, Channel 9, but I’d prefer Dexter. At least he has manners.
112
Vote
   


Players with Wanky Haircuts

August 22nd 2008 06:27
Dale Thomas might be a decent player. I’d dispute this, but there must be something good about him. Why else would various commentators fall over themselves to rate even his most pedestrian grabs as “spectacular”? Do they mean spectacular in the same way as someone praising a dopey child for throwing a ball “close” to its intended target? But I digress.

No, my major beef with Dale Thomas is his impressively dicky haircut. It was bad enough when it was just one of those deliberate messes – the huge bouncing yellow mop that flapped haplessly around while its owner stumbled equally haplessly over the boundary line. So imagine my mixture of delight and horror when it emerged as a black, bouncing mess. With one highly flammable bottle, he passed the point of “slightly toolish” and landed himself firmly in the realm of the “massive wanker


[ Click here to read more ]
120
Vote
   


Listening to Michael Voss’s commentary in the game against Hawthorn, I felt that the new Gold Coast team had dodged a bullet by not securing him as its first coach.

This might seem like a harsh assessment of a Brownlow-winning, triple-premiership captain. But playing ability doesn’t always equal coaching ability, as several high-profile examples will attest. Does anyone even remember Tim Watson’s stint at St Kilda? And the less said about Tony Shaw’s time at Collingwood, the better (unless, of course, you despise Collingwood and remember Shaw’s tenure with the kind of fondness usually reserved for firstborn grandchildren


[ Click here to read more ]
92
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
5 Posts dating from August 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

The Grumpy Traveller's Blogs

131 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
3 Post(s)
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]